0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÇÐ·É Ãʱ⠾Ƶ¿ÀÇ ÈÞ´ëÀüÈ­ Áßµ¶ Á¤µµ¿Í ¿µÇâ ¿äÀÎ

Cell Phone Addiction in School-Age Children and Related Factors

¾Æµ¿°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2015³â 21±Ç 1È£ p.55 ~ 63
KMID : 0606120150210010055
±¸Çö¿µ ( Koo Hyun-Young ) - ´ë±¸°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

±èÀºÁ¤ ( Kim Eun-Jung ) - ¿ö½ÌÅÏ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

Abstract

¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ÃʵîÇб³ 1-4Çгâ»ýÀÎ ÇÐ·É Ãʱ⠾Ƶ¿ÀÇ ºÎ¸ð¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¾Æµ¿ÀÇ ÈÞ´ëÀüÈ­ Áßµ¶ Á¤µµ¸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº¸°í, °³ÀÎÀû Ư¼º°ú ºÎ¸ð °ü·Ã Ư¼ºÀÌ ÈÞ´ëÀüÈ­ Áßµ¶ Á¤µµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ÆľÇÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

¹æ¹ý: ÃʵîÇб³ 1-4Çг⠾Ƶ¿ÀÇ ºÎ¸ð 163¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¾Æµ¿ÀÇ ÈÞ´ëÀüÈ­ Áßµ¶ Á¤µµ ¹× ÀÚ±â ÅëÁ¦·Â°ú ºÎ¸ðÀÇ ÈÞ´ëÀüÈ­ Áßµ¶ Á¤µµ ¹× ÈÞ´ëÀüÈ­ »ç¿ë ÅëÁ¦¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼³¹®Áö¸¦ ÀÛ¼ºÇϵµ·Ï ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼öÁýµÈ ÀÚ·á´Â SPSS/WIN 19.0 IBM ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson¡¯s correlation coefficient ¹× stepwise multiple regressionÀ¸·Î °ËÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: ÇÐ·É Ãʱ⠾Ƶ¿ÀÇ ÈÞ´ëÀüÈ­ Áßµ¶ Á¤µµ¸¦ Ç¥ÁØÁ¡¼ö¿¡ µû¶ó ºÐ·ùÇϸé, ÀÏ¹Ý »ç¿ë±ºÀÌ 86.5%, À§Çè »ç¿ë±ºÀÌ 9.2%, °íÀ§Çè »ç¿ë±ºÀÌ 4.3%¿´´Ù. ¾Æµ¿ÀÇ ÈÞ´ëÀüÈ­ Áßµ¶ Á¤µµ´Â ¾Æµ¿ÀÇ °ÔÀÓ ¿©ºÎ¿Í ºÎ¸ðÀÇ ¿ù¼öÀÔ¿¡ µû¶ó À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ¾Æµ¿ÀÇ ÈÞ´ëÀüÈ­ Áßµ¶ Á¤µµ´Â ºÎ¸ðÀÇ ÈÞ´ëÀüÈ­ »ç¿ë Á¤µµ¿Í ¼ø »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ÀÖ¾ú°í, ¾Æµ¿ÀÇ ÀÚ±â ÅëÁ¦·Â ¹× ºÎ¸ðÀÇ ÈÞ´ëÀüÈ­ »ç¿ë ÅëÁ¦¿Í ¿ª »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ÇÐ·É Ãʱ⠾Ƶ¿ÀÇ ÈÞ´ëÀüÈ­ Áßµ¶¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿äÀÎÀº ¾Æµ¿ÀÇ ÀÚ±â ÅëÁ¦·Â, ¾Æµ¿ÀÇ °ÔÀÓ ¿©ºÎ, ºÎ¸ðÀÇ ÈÞ´ëÀüÈ­ Áßµ¶ Á¤µµ ¹× ºÎ¸ðÀÇ ÈÞ´ëÀüÈ­ »ç¿ë ÅëÁ¦¿´À¸¸ç, ÀÌµé ¿äÀÎÀÇ ¼³¸í·ÂÀº 24%¿´´Ù.

°á·Ð: ÇÐ·É Ãʱ⠾Ƶ¿ÀÇ ÈÞ´ëÀüÈ­ Áßµ¶ Á¤µµ´Â °³ÀÎÀû Ư¼º»Ó ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ºÎ¸ð °ü·Ã Ư¼º¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹Þ´Â´Ù´Â »ç½ÇÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ÇзÉÃʱ⠾Ƶ¿ÀÇ ¿Ã¹Ù¸¥ ÈÞ´ëÀüÈ­ »ç¿ëÀ» À§ÇÑ ÁßÀç¹æ¾È°ú ºÎ¸ð±³À° ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» °³¹ßÇÏ¿© ½Ç½ÃÇÒ ¶§ °³ÀÎÀû Ư¼º»Ó ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ºÎ¸ð °ü·Ã Ư¼ºÀ» °í·ÁÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify cell phone addiction in school-age children and factors influencing addiction.

Methods: The participants were 163 parents of elementary school students in the 1st to 4th grades. Data were collected through self-report questionnaires completed by the parents, and analyzed using the SPSS/WIN 19.0 IBM program.
Results: Of the children, 86.5% were reported as being average users, 9.2%, at risk users, and 4.3%, at high risk users. Cell phone addiction in the children was significantly different according to games played by the children and parents¡¯ monthly income. Significant factors influencing cell phone addiction in the children were children¡¯s self-control, games played by the children, parents¡¯ cell phone addiction and parental control for children¡¯s cell phone use, explaining 24% of variance in cell phone addiction.

Conclusion: The findings indicate that cell phone addiction in school-age children is influenced by parent-related factors as well as personal factors. Therefore approaches to education programs on cell phone use in school-age children should include parent-related factors as well as personal factors of the children.
KeyWords
¾Æµ¿, ÈÞ´ëÀüÈ­, Áßµ¶, ºÎ¸ð
Children, Cell phone, Addictive behavior, Parents
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
  
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed